
| vs |
| BattleCruiser | Carrier |
|---|---|
| Yamoto Gun | Intercepters |
| 100 Votes | 89 Votes |
| Comments | |
|---|---|
|
teh_master_chief 2008-May-24 06:09 |
lol, who the hell suggested this one? At any rate, Carriers win. Battlecruisers have 500 HP, 6 armor, and 34 damage, fully upgraded. Yamato does 260 and costs 150 energy (250 max). Carriers have 300 HP and 150 shields (450 total), 7 armor on their HP, |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-May-24 06:11 |
and 3 on their shields. They also do 9x8 damage (72 total), full upgraded. Unfortunately, Bcs have 6 armor, so that's only 3x8 = 24 dmg. But, Carriers have 8 range, and Bcs have 6. That way, the Protoss user can constantly micro his Carriers out of the |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-May-24 06:14 |
Bcs range, given that Carriers move like twice as fast as BCs. Even if the Battlecruisers Yamato (10 range), they'll only take out half the Carriers (if they are in equal numbers). |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-May-24 06:15 |
That remaining half can slaughter the BCs with impunity for the next 50-100 seconds, and should be able to kill most of them in that time so that the next Yamato volley won't do much. That's assuming the perfect scenario, as BCs only have 50 energy when |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-May-24 06:17 |
they're built. In lore, Carriers win EASILY. A single Carrier can sterilize an entire planet, and BCs have no such firepower. |
|
Mu La Flaga 2008-May-26 03:28 |
Lol BattleCruiser is winning. |
|
Mu La Flaga 2008-May-26 13:32 |
People really think that things that sound cooler are better ignoring true facts. |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-May-27 06:15 |
Yeah, honestly. That, or they're too lazy to read a couple of sentences that clearly outline why Carriers are better. |
|
Mu La Flaga 2008-Jun-03 19:19 |
Eh. BattleCruiser is still winning? |
|
Mu La Flaga 2008-Jun-08 18:15 |
Ok just a few more votes, Carriers nearly winning. |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-Jun-10 16:55 |
O YEAH, I broke the tie. 38-37 Carrier. What now, BC voters? |
|
Kennedy 2008-Jun-13 01:41 |
lol i like both i use both all tho i give my vote to the carrier |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-Jun-16 06:06 |
Well BCS suck, and there's little use from them outside of Fastest. They are horribly cost-inefficient, are slow, and have less DPS than Carriers. Carriers have longer range, mroe speed, and will almost always destroy a force ill-equipped to fight capital |
|
teh_master_chief 2008-Jun-16 06:07 |
air. Especially if they get a cliff or something, they're ridiculously strong. BCS will usually lose to Dragoons, and at like 3x the cost.... |
|
Tavenger007 2008-Jul-30 04:39 |
well, im saying battlecruiser cause it could kinda blow up the carrier, but it was close! |